Advertisement

Manipulative Therapy in Addition to Usual Care for Patients With Shoulder Complaints: Results of Physical Examination Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial

      Abstract

      Objective

      The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of manipulative therapy on the shoulder girdle, in addition to usual care provided by the general practitioner, on the outcomes of physical examination tests for the treatment of shoulder complaints.

      Methods

      This was a randomized controlled trial in a primary care setting in the Netherlands. A total of 150 participants were recruited from December 2000 until December 2002. All patients received usual care by the general practitioner. Usual care included one or more of the following depending on the needs of the patient: information/advice, oral analgesics or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, corticosteroid injections, exercises, and massage. In addition to usual care, the intervention group received manipulative therapy, up to 6 treatment sessions in a 12-week period. Twenty-four physical examination tests were done at baseline and after 6, 12, and 26 weeks. Factor analysis was done to reduce the number of outcome measures.

      Results

      The factor analysis resulted in 4 factors: “shoulder pain,” “neck pain,” “shoulder mobility,” and “neck mobility.” At 6 weeks, no significant differences between groups were found. At 12 weeks, the mean changes of all 4 factors favored the intervention group; the factors “shoulder pain” and “neck pain” reached statistical significance (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1-2.1). At 26 weeks, differences in the factors “shoulder pain” (95% CI, 0.0-2.6), “shoulder mobility” (95% CI, 0.2-1.7), and “mobility neck” (95% CI, 0.2-1.3) statistically favored the intervention group.

      Conclusion

      In this pragmatic study, manipulative therapy, in addition to usual care by the general practitioner, diminished severity of shoulder pain and neck pain and improved shoulder and neck mobility.

      Key Indexing Terms

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Norlander S
        • Gustavsson BA
        • Lindell J
        • Nordgren B
        Reduced mobility in the cervico-thoracic motion segment-a risk factor for musculoskeletal neck-shoulder pain: a two-year prospective follow-up study.
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997; 29: 167-174
        • Sobel JS
        • Kremer I
        • Winters JC
        • Arendzen JH
        • de Jong BM
        The influence of the mobility in the cervicothoracic spine and the upper ribs (shoulder girdle) on the mobility of the scapulohumeral joint.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996; 19: 469-474
        • Winters JC
        • Sobel JS
        • Groenier KH
        • Arendzen HJ
        • Meyboom-de Jong B
        Comparison of physiotherapy, manipulation, and corticosteroid injection for treating shoulder complaints in general practice: randomised, single blind study.
        BMJ. 1997; 314: 1320-1325
        • Bergman GJ
        • Winters JC
        • van der Heijden GJ
        • Postema K
        • Meyboom-de Jong B.
        Groningen Manipulation Study. The effect of manipulation of the structures of the shoulder girdle as additional treatment for symptom relief and for prevention of chronicity or recurrence of shoulder symptoms. Design of a randomized controlled trial within a comprehensive prognostic cohort study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002; 25: 543-549
        • Bergman GJD
        • Winters JC
        • Groenier KH
        • Pool JJM
        • Meyboom-de Jong B
        • Postema K
        • et al.
        Manipulative therapy in addition to usual medical care for patients with shoulder pain and dysfunction. A randomized, controlled trial.
        Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 432-439
        • Beurskens AJ
        • de Vet HC
        • Koke AJ
        • Lindeman E
        • van der Heijden GJ
        • Regtop W
        • et al.
        A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999; 22: 144-148
        • van der Windt DA
        • Koes BW
        • Deville W
        • Boeke AJP
        • De Jong BA
        • Bouter LM
        Effectiveness of corticosteroid injections versus physiotherapy for treatment of painful stiff shoulder in primary care: randomised trial.
        BMJ. 1998; 317: 1292-1296
        • Winters JC
        • De Jong AC
        • van der Windt DAWM
        • Jonquiere M
        • de Winter AF
        • van der Heijden GJMG
        • et al.
        NHG-Standaard Schouderklachten (versie 1999) [Guidelines for Shoulder Complaints of the Dutch College of General Practitioners (version 1999)].
        Huisarts Wet. 1999; 42: 222-231
        • Winters JC
        • Sobel JS
        • Groenier KH
        • Arendzen JH
        • Meyboom-de Jong B
        A shoulder pain score: a comprehensive questionnaire for assessing pain in patients with shoulder complaints.
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1996; 28: 163-167
        • Westerberg CE
        • Solem-Bertoft E
        • Lundh I.
        The reliability of three active motor tests used in painful shoulder disorders. Presentation of a method of general applicability for the analysis of reliability in the presence of pain.
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1996; 28: 63-70
        • Neer CS
        Impingement lesions.
        Clin Orthop. 1983; : 70-77
        • Jirout J
        Röntgenstudie der Dynamik der ersten Rippe.
        Manuelle Medicine. 1983; 21: 20-22
        • Kerlinger FN
        Factor analysis. Foundations of behavioral research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London1973: 659-692