Prize-winning papers| Volume 23, ISSUE 2, P91-95, February 2000

Download started.


A randomized controlled trial of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for migraine


      Objective: To assess the efficacy of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) in the treatment of migraine. Design: A randomized controlled trial of 6 months' duration. The trial consisted of 3 stages: 2 months of data collection (before treatment), 2 months of treatment, and a further 2 months of data collection (after treatment). Comparison of outcomes to the initial baseline factors was made at the end of the 6 months for both an SMT group and a control group. Setting: Chiropractic Research Center of Macquarie University. Participants: One hundred twenty-seven volunteers between the ages of 10 and 70 years were recruited through media advertising. The diagnosis of migraine was made on the basis of the International Headache Society standard, with a minimum of at least one migraine per month. Intervention: Two months of chiropractic SMT (diversified technique) at vertebral fixations determined by the practitioner (maximum of 16 treatments). Main outcome measures: Participants completed standard, headache diaries during the entire trial noting the frequency, intensity (visual analogne score), duration, disability, associated symptoms, and use of medication for each migraine episode. Results: The average response of the treatment group (n = 83) showed statistically significant improvement in migraine frequency (P <.005), duration (P <.01), disability (P <.05), and medication use (P <.001) when compared with the control group (n = 40). Four persons failed to complete the trial because of a variety of causes, including change in residence, a motor vehicle accident, and increased migraine frequency. Expressed in other terms, 22% of participants reported more than a 90% reduction of migraines as a consequenc of the 2 months of SMT. Approximately 50% more participants reported significant improvement in the morbidity of each episode. Conclusion: The results of this study support previous results showing that some people report significant improvement in migraines after chirupractic SMT. A high percentage (>80%) of participants reported stress as a major factor for their migraines. It appears probable that chiropractic care has an effect on the physical conditions related to stress and that in these people the effects of the migraine are reduced. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther2000;23:91–5)


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Migraine Foundation of Australia
        Migraine—not just a headache.
        Migraine Foundation of Australia, Sydney1996
        • Lipton RB
        • Stewart WF
        • Celentano DD
        • Reed ML
        Undiagnosed migraine: a comparison of symtom-based and physician diagnosis.
        Arch Intern Med. 1992; 152: 1273-1278
        • King J
        Migraine in the workplace. Brainwaves.
        in: Australian Brain Foundation, Hawthorn, Victoria1995: 1-4
        • De Lissvoy G
        • Lazarus SS
        The economic cost of migraine: present state of knowledge.
        Neurology. 1994; 44: S56-S62
        • Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society
        Classfification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain.
        Cephalalgia. 1988; 8: 1-96
        • Lance JW
        A concept of migraine and the search for the ideal headache drug.
        Headache. 1990; 1: 17-23
        • Dalassio D
        The pathology of migraine.
        Clin J Pain. 1990; 6: 235-239
        • Badeqitz-Dodd LH
        Cardiovascular system.
        in: Mims Annual. Mims Australia, Sydney1995: 158-163
        • Lance JW
        • Lambert GA
        • Goadsby PJ
        • Zagami AS
        5-Hydroxytryptamine and its putative aetiological involvement in migraine.
        Cephalalgia. 1989; 9: 7-13
        • Ferrari MD
        • Odink J
        • Tapparelli C
        • Van Kempen GM
        • Pennings EJ
        • Bruyn GW
        Serotonin metabolism in migraine.
        Neurology. 1989; 39: 1239-1242
        • Dalassio D
        The pathology of migraine.
        Clin J Pain. 1990; 6: 235-239
        • Stellar S
        • Ahrens SP
        • Meibohm AR
        • Reines SA
        Migraine prevention with timolol. A double-blind crossover study.
        JAMA. 1984; 252: 2576-2580
        • Zeigler D
        • Hurwitz A
        • Hassanein R
        • Kodanaz HA
        • Preskorn SH
        • Mason J
        Migraine prophylaxis. A comparison of propranolol and amitriptyline.
        Arch Neurol. 1987; 44: 486-489
        • Bovin G
        • Sand T
        Cervicogenic headache, migraine without aura and tension-type headache. Diagnostic blockade of greater occipital and supra orbital nerves.
        Pain. 1992; 51: 43-48
        • Malmgren R
        The central serotoninergic system.
        Cephalalgia. 1990; 10: 199-204
        • Winner P
        A double-blind study of subcutaneous dihydroergotamine versus subcutaneous sumatriptan in the treatment of acute migraine.
        Arch Neurol. 1996; 53: 180-184
        • Tuchin PJ
        • Bonello R
        Classic migraine or not classic migraine, that is the question.
        Aust J Chiropr Osteo. 1996; 5: 66-74
        • Nelson CF
        The tension headache, migraine continuum: a hypothesis.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994; 17: 157-167
        • Rasmussen BK
        • Jensen R
        • Schroll M
        • Olsen J
        Interactions between migraine and tension type headaches in the general population.
        Arch Neurol. 1992; 49: 914-918
        • Kidd R
        • Nelson C
        Musculoskeletal dysfunction of the neck in migraine and tension headache.
        Headache. 1993; 33: 566-569
        • Milne E
        The mechanism and treatment of migraine and other disorders of cervical and postural dysfunction.
        Cephalgia. 1989; : 381-382
        • Tuchin PJ
        The efficacy of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) in the treatment of migraine—a pilot study.
        Aust Chiro Osteo. 1997; 6: 41-47
        • Bogduk N
        Cervical causes of headache and dizziness.
        in: 2nd ed. Modern manual therapy of the vertebral column. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1994: 317-331
        • Vernon H
        • Steiman I
        • Hagino C
        Cervicogenic dysfunction in muscle contraction headache and migraine: a descriptive study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 418-429
        • Kaube H
        • Hoskin KL
        • Goadsby PJ
        Inhibition by sumatriptan of central trigeminal neurons only after blood-brain barrier disruption.
        Br J Pharmacol. 1993; 109: 788-792
        • Simmons VE
        • Blakeborough P
        The safety profile of sumatriptan.
        Rev Contemp Pharmacother. 1994; 5: 319-328
        • Lance J
        • Lambert G
        • Goadsby P
        • et al.
        5-Hydroxytryptamine and its putative etiological involvement in migraine.
        Cephalgia. 1989; : 7-13
        • Jull GA
        Cervical headache: a review.
        in: 2nd ed. Modern manual therapy of the vertebral column. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1994: 333-346
      1. Pikus HJ, Phillips JM. Outcome of surgical decompression of the second cervical root for cervicogenic headache. Neurosurg 39:63–71.

        • Vernon HT
        Spinal manipulation and headache of cervical origin.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989; 12: 455-468
        • Sjasstad O
        • Fredricksen TA
        • Stolt-Nielsen A
        Cervicogenic headache, C2 rhizopathy, and occipital neuralgia: a connection.
        Cephalgia. 1986; 6: 189-195
        • Marcus DA
        Migraine and tension type headaches: the questionable validity of current classification systems.
        Pain. 1992; 8: 28-36
        • Tuchin PJ
        • Scwafer T
        • Brookes M
        A Case study of chronic headaches.
        Aust Chiro Osteo. 1996; 5: 47-53
        • Ottervanger JP
        • Stricker BH
        Cardiovascular adverse reactions to sumatriptan: cause for concern?.
        CNS Drugs. 1995; 3: 90-98
        • Simmons VE
        • Blakeborough P
        The safety profile of sumatriptan.
        Rev Contemp Pharmacother. 1994; 5: 319-328
        • Boline PD
        • Kassak K
        • Bronfort G
        • et al.
        Spinal manipulations vs Amitriptyline for the treatment of chronic tension-type headaches: a randomized clinical trial.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 148-154
        • Nielsen N
        A randomized clinical trial of the effect of spinal manipulations for the treatment of cervicogenic headache.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 435-440
        • Parker GB
        • Tupling H
        • Pryor DS
        A controlled trial of cervical manipulation for migraine.
        Aust NZ J Med. 1978; 8: 585-593
        • Young K
        • Dharmi M.
        The efficacy of cervical manipulation as opposed to pharmocological therapeutics in the treatment of migraine patients. Transactions of the Consortium for Chiropractic Research.