A survey of practice patterns and the health promotion and prevention attitudes of US chiropractors. Maintenance Care: Part I


      Objective: To investigate the primary care, health promotion activities associated with what has historically been called “maintenance care” (MC) as used in the practice of chiropractic in the United States. This includes issues such as investigating the purpose of MC, what conditions and patient populations it best serves, how frequently it is required, what therapeutic interventions constitute MC, how often it is recommended, and what percent of patient visits are for prevention and health promotion services. It also investigates the economic impact of these services. Design: Postal survey of a randomized sample of practicing US chiropractors. The questionnaire was structured with a 5-point ordinal Likert scale (28 questions) and brief fill-in questionnaire (12 questions). The 40-question survey was mailed to 1500 chiropractors selected at random from a pool of chiropractors with active practices in the United States. The National Directory of Chiropractic database was the source of actively practicing chiropractors from which doctor selection was made. The sample was derived by using the last numbers composing the zip codes assigned by the US Postal Service. This sampling method assured potential inclusion of chiropractors from all 50 states, from rural areas and large cities, and assured a sample weighting based on population density that might not have been afforded by a simple random sample. Results: Six hundred and fifty-eight (44%) of the questionnaires were completed and returned. US chiropractors agreed or strongly agreed that the purpose of MC was to optimize health (90%), prevent conditions from developing (88%), provide palliative care (86%), and minimize recurrence or exacerbations (95%). MC was viewed as helpful in preventing both musculoskeletal and visceral health problems. There was strong agreement that the therapeutic composition of MC placed virtually equal weight on exercise (96%) and adjustments/manipulation (97%) and that other interventions, including dietary recommendations (93%) and patient education about lifestyle changes (84%), shared a high level of importance. Seventy-nine percent of chiropractic patients have MC recommended to them and nearly half of those (34%) comply. The average number of recommended MC visits was 14.4 visits per year, and the total revenue represents an estimated 23% of practice income. Conclusions: Despite educational, philosophic, and political differences, US chiropractors come to a consensus about the purpose and composition of MC. Not withstanding the absence of scientific support, they believe that it is of value to all age groups and a variety of conditions from stress to musculoskeletal and visceral conditions. This strong belief in the preventive and health promotion value of MC motivates them to recommend this care to most patients. This, in turn, results in a high level of preventive services and income averaging an estimated $50,000 per chiropractic practice in 1994. The data suggest that the amount of services and income generated by preventive and health-promoting services may be second only to those from the treatment of low-back pain. The response from this survey also suggests that the level of primary care, health promotion and prevention activities of chiropractors surpasses that of other physicians. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000;23:1–9)


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • US Department of Health and Human Services
        Healthy people 2000.
        (DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 91-50212) US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington (DC)1990
        • Institute of Medicine
        A manpower policy for primary care: a report of a study.
        National Academy of Science, Washington, DC1978
        • Jamison JR.
        Health promotion for chiropractic practice.
        Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg (MD)1991
        • Bowers LJ
        • Mootz RD
        The nature of primary care: the chiropractor's role.
        Top Clin Chiro. 1995; 2: 66-84
        • Baffi CR
        • Redican KJ
        • Olsen LK
        The chiropractor, primary care, and high-level wellness: current perspectives, expenditures, and demographics.
        The Digest of Chiropractic Economics. 1987;March/April; : 36-39
        • Coulter ID
        The patient, the practitioner, and wellness: paradigm lost, paradigm gained.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990; 13: 107-111
        • Hawk C
        • Dusio ME
        A survey of 492 US chiropractors on primary care and prevention-related issues.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 57-64
        • Sawyer C
        • Boline PD
        Chiropractic attitudes about exercise and other health behaviors.
        Chiropr Sports Med. 1990; 4: 9-12
        • Boline PD
        • Sawyer CE
        Health promotion attitudes of chiropractic physicians.
        Am J Chiropr Med. 1990; 3: 71-76
        • Gibbons R
        Alchemy in the creation of chiropractic: understanding the ingredients of survival.
        Am J Chiropr Med. 1989; 2: 117-121
        • Mitchell MC
        Maintenance care: some considerations.
        Am Chiropr Assoc J Chiropr. 1980; 17: 53-55
        • Jamison JR
        Preventive chiropractic: what justification?.
        Chiropr J Aust. 1991; 21: 10-12
      1. Rupert RL, Sandefur R, Wagnon R. Chiropractic “maintenance care.” Proceedings of the 1993 International Conference on Spinal Manipulation, 1993 Apr 30-May 1;Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

        • Webb M
        • Leboeuf C
        Recently graduated chiropractors in Australia: part II—certain professional attitudes and practice characteristics.
        J Aust Chiropr Assoc. 1987; 17: 151-154
      2. National directory of chiropractic. One Directory of Chiropractic, Inc;, Olathe (KS)1995
      3. National five-digit zip code and post office directory. United States Postal Service, Memphis (TN)1996
        • Converse J
        • Presser S.
        Survey questions: handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Series: quantitative applications in the Social Sciences.
        Sage, Beverly Hills (CA)1984
        • Labaw W
        Advanced questionnaire design.
        in: Abt Books, Cambridge (MA)1980: 16-18
        • Sudman S
        • Bradburn N.
        Asking questions: a practical guide to questionnaire design.
        Jossey-Bass, San Francisco1982
        • Goertz C
        Summary of the 1995 ACA annual statistical survey on chiropractic practice.
        J Am Chiropr Assoc. 1996; 33: 35-41
        • Frank E
        • Harvey LK
        Prevention advice rates of women and men physicians.
        Arch Fam Med. 1996; 5: 215-219
        • Breen A
        Chiropractors and the treatment of back pain.
        Rheumatol Rehabil. 1977; 16: 46-53
        • Leboeuf C
        • Morrow JD
        • Payne RL
        Preliminary investigation of the relationship between certain practice characteristics and practice location: chiropractor-population ratio.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989; 12: 253-258
        • Shekelle PG
        • Brook RH
        A community-based study of the use of chiropractic services.
        Am J Public Health. 1991; 81: 439-442
        • Price JH
        • Desmond SM
        • Losh DP
        • Krol RA
        Family practice physicians' perceptions and practices regarding health promotion for the elderly.
        Am J Prev Med. 1988; 4: 274-281
        • Alto WA
        Prevention in practice.
        Prim Care. 1995; 22: 543-554
        • Rubin JD
        • Sobal J
        • Moran MT
        Health promotion beliefs and practices of fourth-year medical students.
        Am J Prev Med. 1990; 6: 106-111
        • Walsh JM
        • Papadakis MA
        Prevention training and medical residency.
        Am J Prev Med. 1994; 10: 168-171
        • Caplan RL
        Health-care reform and chiropractic in the 1990s.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991; 14: 341-354
        • Homola S
        Seeking a common denominator in the use of spinal manipulation.
        Chiropr Tech. 1992; 4: 61-63
        • Nelson CF
        Chiropractic and wellness care.
        J Chiropr Human. 1994; 4: 3-19
        • Coulter ID
        • Hurwitz EL
        • Aronow HU
        • Cassata DM
        • Beck JC
        Chiropractic patients in a comprehensive home-based geriatric assessment, follow-up and health promotion program.
        Top Clin Chiro. 1996; 3: 46-55
        • Jamison JR
        Acceptance and identity: the conundrum of contemporary chiropractic.
        Chiropr J Aust. 1993; 23: 136-140
        • Jamison JR
        Holistic health care in primary practice: chiropractic contributing to a sustainable health care system.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 604-608
        • Aker PD
        • Martel J
        Maintenance care.
        Top Clin Chiro. 1996; 3: 32-35