Advertisement

Prevalence of nonmusculoskeletal complaints in chiropractic practice: Report from a practice based research program

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Objective: To identify patient and practice characteristics that might contribute to people's seeking chiropractic care for nonmusculoskeletal complaints.
      Design: This was a cross-sectional study conducted through the methods of practice-based research.
      Setting: Data were collected in 1998-1999 in chiropractic offices in the United States, Canada, and Australia; data were managed by a practice-based research office operating in a chiropractic research center.
      Population: The subjects were new and established patients of all ages who visited the participating offices during a designated data collection week.
      Data Analysis: Multiple logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with patients' presenting for nonmusculoskeletal chief complaints. Pearson's X2 test was used to examine associations among practice variables and the proportion of patients with nonmusculoskeletal chief complaints.
      Results: A total of 7651 patients of 161 chiropractors in 110 practices in 32 states and 2 Canadian provinces participated; data from 2 Australian practices were included in the totals but not in the analysis. Nonmusculoskeletal complaints accounted for 10.3% of the chief complaints. The following characteristics made patients more likely to present with nonmusculoskeletal chief complaints: being less than 14 years of age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 6.9; 95% CI, 5.2-9.1); being female (AOR, 1.5; CI, 1.3-1.8); presenting in a small town/rural location (AOR, 1.9; CI, 1.3-2.7); reporting more than 1 complaint, especially nonmusculoskeletal complaints (AOR, 4.9; CI, 3.9-6.0); having received medical care for the chief complaint (AOR, 3.4; CI, 2.9-4.1); and having first received chiropractic care before 1960 (AOR, 1.7; CI, 1.1-2.4). Practices with the highest proportion of patients with nonmusculoskeletal chief complaints (>17%) were less likely to accept insurance and more likely to be in locations with populations greater than 100,000. They used the most common chiropractic adjustive techniques less frequently and used more nonadjustive procedures, especially diet/nutrition counseling, nutritional supplementation, herbal preparations, naturopathy, and homeopathy.
      Conclusions: Drawing on practices with the patient and practice characteristics identified in this study to conduct outcomes studies on nonmusculoskeletal conditions is a possible direction for future research.

      Key Indexing Terms

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chapman-Smith D.
        The chiropractic report. 1997; 11: 1-4
        • Budgell BS
        Spinal manipulative therapy and visceral disorders.
        Chiropr J Aust. 1999; 29: 123-128
        • LeBouef-Yde C
        • Axen I
        • Ahlefeldt G
        • Lidefelt P
        • Rosenbaum A
        • Thurnberry T
        The types and frequencies of improved nonmusculoskeletal symptoms reported after chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999; 22: 559-564
        • Hurwitz EL
        • Coulter ID
        • Adams AH
        • Genovese BJ
        • Shekelle PG
        Use of chiropractic services from 1985-1991 in the United States and Canada.
        Am J Public Health. 1998; 88: 771-776
        • Hawk C
        Chiropractic clinical research: where are we looking for the key.
        JNMS J Neuromusculoskeletal Syst. 2000; 7: 150-155
        • Nutting PA
        • Beasley JW
        • Werner JJ
        Practice-based research networks answer primary care questions.
        JAMA. 1999; 281: 686-688
        • Hawk C
        • Long CR
        • Boulanger K
        Development of a practicebased research program.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998; 21: 149-156
        • Carey TS
        • Kinsinger L
        • Keyserling T
        • Harris R
        Research in the community: recruiting and retaining practices.
        J Community Health. 1996; 21: 315-327
        • Hawk C
        A chiropractic practice-based research network.
        Palmer J Res. 1995; 2: 93-95
        • Nutting PA
        • Green LA
        And the evidence continues to establish the feasibility of practice-based research [editorial].
        Fam Med. 1993; 25: 434-436
        • Culpepper L
        • Froom J
        The International Primary Care Network: purpose, methods, and policies.
        Fam Med. 1988; 20: 197-201
        • Hosmer DW
        • Lemeshow S
        Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, New York1989
        • Eisenberg DM
        • Kessler RC
        • Foster C
        • Norlock FE
        • Calkins DR
        • Delbanco TL
        Unconventional medicine in the United States: prevalence, costs, and patterns of use.
        N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 246-252
        • National Board of Chiropractic Examiners
        Job analysis of chiropractic. National Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Greeley (CO)1993