Original Article| Volume 30, ISSUE 2, P135-139, February 2007

Download started.


Results of Chiropractic Treatment of Lumbopelvic Fixation in 44 Patients Admitted to an Orthopedic Department



      The objectives of this study were to report on and evaluate the results of chiropractic care for patients with low back pain in an orthopedic department.


      The target group consisted of 44 consecutive patients who experienced sudden and painful low back pain caused by lumbar flexion and rotation without axial loading. Clinical and neurologic examinations by orthopedic surgeons revealed no pathology; in addition, skeletal radiography, computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings were all normal. Diagnosis before hospitalization was acute sciatica in all cases. Examination by the doctor of chiropractic indicated that the patients had lumbopelvic fixation. According to preestablished inclusion and exclusion criteria, 33 patients were treated in the chiropractor's clinic, whereas 11 who could not be transported were initially treated by the chiropractor in the hospital. The mean follow-up was 2 years.


      All but two patients returned to work. The period of sick leave among the patients was reduced by two thirds as compared with that associated with conventional medical treatment.


      To our knowledge, this is the first report on the work of a chiropractor participating within an orthopedic department of a Norwegian hospital as initiated by the hospital and with full support of the staff. The results support the initiative of the Norwegian government to increase reference to chiropractors in treating patients with neuromusculoskeletal dysfunctions. Based on our experience, we believe that the inclusion of chiropractors within hospital orthopedic departments is feasible and provides a patient care resource that may benefit not only the patients but also the department as a whole.

      Key Indexing Terms

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Triano JJ
        Interaction of spinal biomechanics and physiology.
        in: Haldemann S Principles and practice of chiropractic. 2nd ed. Appleton & Lange, Connecticut1992: 225-257
        • Crone C
        • Hultborn H
        • Kiehn O
        • Mazieres L
        • Wigstrøm H
        Maintained changes in motoneuronal excitability by short-lasting synaptic inputs in the decerebrate cat.
        J Physiol (London). 1998; 405: 321-343
        • Indahl AA
        • Kaigle A
        • Reikerås O
        • Holm S
        Electromyographic response on the porcine multifidus musculature after nerve stimulation.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 2652-2658
        • Hides JA
        • Stokes MJ
        • Saide M
        • Jull GA
        • Cooper DH
        Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral to symptoms in patients with acute/subacute low back pain.
        Spine. 1994; 19: 165-172
        • Ottesen S
        Pain produces pain.
        Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen. 1993; 12: 1480-1482
        • Melzack R
        • Wall PD
        Pain mechanisms, “a new theory”.
        Science. 1965; 150: 971-979
        • Tjølsen A
        • Hole K
        Pain regulation and plasticity.
        Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen. 1993; 23: 2921-2924
        • Terret AGJ
        • Vernon H
        Manipulation and pain tolerance.
        Am J Phys Med. 1984; 63: 217-225
        • Vernon HT
        • Aker P
        • Burns S
        • Viljakaanen S
        • Short L
        Pressure pain threshold evaluation of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of chronic neck pain. Pilot study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990; 13: 13-16
        • Cassidy JD
        • Lopes AA
        • Yong-Hing K
        The immediate effect of manipulation versus mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine. Randomized controlled trial.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 570-575
        • Travell JG
        Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the triggerpoint manual.
        in: William & Wilkins, Baltimore1983: 5-44
        • Bogduk N
        The anatomical basis for spinal pain syndrome.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 603-605
        • Kirkaldy-Willis WH
        • Bernard TN
        Managing low back pain.
        in: 4th ed. Churchill-Livingstone, 1999: 206
        • Liebenson C
        Rehabilitation of the spine: a practitioner's manual.
        in: 1st ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore1996: 34-35
        • Magee DJ
        Orthopedic physical assessment.
        in: 2nd ed. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia1992: 10