Advertisement

Spinal Motion Palpation: A Comparison of Studies That Assessed Intersegmental End Feel Vs Excursion

      Abstract

      Objective

      Spinal motion palpation (MP) is a procedure used to detect intersegmental hypomobility/hypermobility. Different means of assessing intersegmental mobility are described, assessing either excursion of the segments (quantity of movement) or end feel (quality of motion when stressed against the paraphysiological space). The objective of this review was to classify and compare studies based on method of MP used, considering that some studies may have used both methods.

      Methods

      Four databases were searched: MEDLINE-PubMed, Manual Alternative and Natural Therapy System, Index to Chiropractic Literature, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases for the years 1965 through January 2007. Retrieved citations were independently screened for inclusion by 2 of the authors consistent with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies were appraised for quality, and data were extracted and recorded in tables.

      Results

      The search strategy generated 415 citations, and 29 were harvested from reference lists. After removing articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 44 were considered relevant and appraised for quality. Fifteen studies focused on MP excursion, 24 focused on end feel, and 5 used both. Eight studies reported high levels of reproducibility (κ = ≥0.4), although 4 were not of acceptable quality, and 2 were only marginally acceptable. When only high-quality studies were considered, 3 of 24 end-feel studies reported good reliability compared with 1 of 15 excursion studies. There was no statistical support for a difference between the 2 groupings.

      Conclusions

      A difference in reported reliability was observed when the method of MP varied, although it was not statistically significant. There was no support in the literature for the advantage of one MP method over the other.

      Key Indexing Terms

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Leboeuf-Yde C
        • van Dijk J
        • Franz C
        • et al.
        Motion palpation findings and self-reported low back pain in a population-based study sample.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002; 25: 80-87
        • Hestbaek L
        • Leboeuf-Yde C
        Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23: 258-275
        • Huijbregts PA
        Spinal motion palpation: a review of reliability studies.
        J Man Manip Ther. 2002; 10: 24-39
        • Dishman RW
        Static and dynamic components of the chiropractic subluxation complex: a literature review.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1988; 11: 98-107
        • Haas M
        The reliability of reliability.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991; 14: 199-208
        • Breen A
        The reliability of palpation and other diagnostic methods.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 54-56
        • Panzer DM
        The reliability of lumbar motion palpation.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 518-524
      1. Stochkendahl MJ, Christensen HW, Hartvigsen J, et al. Manual examination of the spine: a systematic critical literature review of reproducibility. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006;29:475-85, 85 e1-10.

        • Cassidy J
        • Potter G
        Motion examination of the lumbar spine.
        J Man Manip Ther. 1979; 2: 151-158
        • Maclure M
        • Willett WC
        Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1987; 126: 161-169
        • Rosner B
        Fundamentals of biostatistics. 4th ed. Duxbury Press, Belmont, Calif1995: 518
        • Portney LG
        • Watkins MP
        Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ2000: xiv, 768
        • Haas M
        Statistical methodology for reliability studies.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991; 14: 119-132
        • Inscoe E
        • Witt P
        • Gross M
        • et al.
        Reliability in evaluating passive intervertebral motion of the lumbar spine.
        J Man Manip Ther. 1995; 3: 135-143
        • Meyer P
        Precision Journalism: A Reporter's Introduction to Social Science Methods. 4 ed. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., New York2002: 194
        • Brunarski DJ
        Chiropractic biomechanical evaluations: validity in myofascial low back pain.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1982; 5: 155-161
        • Deboer KF
        • Harmon R
        • Tuttle CD
        • et al.
        Reliability study of detection of somatic dysfunctions in the cervical spine.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1985; 8: 9-16
        • French SD
        • Green S
        • Forbes A
        Reliability of chiropractic methods commonly used to detect manipulable lesions in patients with chronic low-back pain.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23: 231-238
        • Johnston WL
        • Allan BR
        • Hendra JL
        • et al.
        Interexaminer study of palpation in detecting location of spinal segmental dysfunction.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1983; 82: 839-845
        • Johnston WL
        • Beal MC
        • Blum GA
        • et al.
        Passive gross motion testing: Part III. Examiner agreement on selected subjects.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1982; 81: 309-313
        • Johnston WL
        • Elkiss ML
        • Marino RV
        • et al.
        Passive gross motion testing: Part II. A study of interexaminer agreement.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1982; 81: 304-308
        • Johnston WL
        • Hill JL
        Spinal segmental dysfunction: incidence in cervicothoracic region.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1981; 81: 22-28
        • Johnston WL
        • Hill JL
        • Elkiss ML
        • et al.
        Identification of stable somatic findings in hypertensive subjects by trained examiners using palpatory examination.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1982; 81: 830-836
      2. Johnston WL, Kelso AF, Babcock HB. Changes in presence of a segmental dysfunction pattern associated with hypertension: Part 1. A short-term longitudinal study. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1995;95:243-8, 53-5.

        • Johnston WL
        • Hill JL
        • Sealey JW
        • et al.
        Palpatory findings in the cervicothoracic region: variations in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. A preliminary report.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1980; 79: 300-308
        • Jull G
        • Zito G
        • Trott P
        • et al.
        Inter-examiner reliability to detect painful upper cervical joint dysfunction.
        Aust J Physiother. 1997; 43: 125-129
        • McConnell DG
        • Beal MC
        • Dinnar U
        • et al.
        Low agreement of findings in neuromusculoskeletal examinations by a group of osteopathic physicians using their own procedures.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1980; 79: 441-450
        • Moran RW
        • Gibbons P
        Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability for palpation of the cranial rhythmic impulse at the head and sacrum.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001; 24: 183-190
        • Rhudy T
        • Sandefur M
        • Burk J
        Interexaminer/intertechnique reliability in spinal subluxation assessment: a multifactorial approach.
        Am J Chiropr Med. 1988; 1: 111-114
        • Pool JJ
        • Hoving JL
        • de Vet HC
        • et al.
        The interexaminer reproducibility of physical examination of the cervical spine.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004; 27: 84-90
        • Beal MC
        • Goodridge JP
        • Johnston WL
        • et al.
        Interexaminer agreement on patient improvement after negotiated selection of tests.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1980; 79: 432-440
        • Ghoukassian M
        • Nicholls B
        • Mclaughlin P
        Inter-examiner reliability of the Johnson and Friedman percussion scan of the thoracic spine.
        J Osteopath Med. 2001; 4: 15-20
        • Hart J
        Palpation and X-ray of the upper cervical spine: a reliability study.
        J Vertebr Subluxat Res. 2006; 25: 1-14
        • Horneij E
        • Hemborg B
        • Johnsson B
        • et al.
        Clinical tests on impairment level related to low back pain: a study of test reliability.
        J Rehabil Med. 2002; 34: 176-182
        • Kappler RE
        • Larson NJ
        • Kelso AF
        A comparison of structural examination findings obtained by experienced physician examiners and student examiners on hospital patients.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1976; 75: 528-529
        • Toussaint R
        • Gawlik CS
        • Rehder U
        • et al.
        Sacroiliac joint diagnostics in the Hamburg Construction Workers Study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999; 22: 139-143
        • Van Suijlekom HA
        • De Vet HC
        • Van Den Berg SG
        • et al.
        Interobserver reliability in physical examination of the cervical spine in patients with headache.
        Headache. 2000; 40: 581-586
        • Viikari-Juntura E
        Interexaminer reliability of observations in physical examinations of the neck.
        Phys Ther. 1987; 67: 1526-1532
        • Gonella C
        • Paris SV
        • Kutner M
        Reliability in evaluating passive intervertebral motion.
        Phys Ther. 1982; 62: 436-444
        • Leboeuf C
        • Gardner V
        • Carter A
        • et al.
        Chiropractic examination procedures: a reliability and consistency study.
        J Aust Chiropr Assoc. 1989; 19: 101-104
        • de Wijer A
        • Steenks MH
        • Bosman F
        • et al.
        Symptoms of the stomatognathic system in temporomandibular and cervical spine disorders.
        J Oral Rehabil. 1996; 23: 733-741
        • Fligg B
        Lower cervical spine motion palpation (C2-7).
        J Can Chiropr Assoc. 1984; 28: 219-221
        • Haas M
        • Panzer D
        • Peterson D
        • et al.
        Short-term responsiveness of manual thoracic end-play assessment to spinal manipulation: a randomized controlled trial of construct validity.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 582-589
        • van der Wurff P
        • Hagmeijer RH
        • Meyne W
        Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. A systemic methodological review: Part 1. Reliability.
        Man Ther. 2000; 5: 30-36
        • van Schalkwyk R
        • Parkin-Smith GF
        A clinical trial investigating the possible effect of the supine cervical rotatory manipulation and the supine lateral break manipulation in the treatment of mechanical neck pain: a pilot study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23: 324-331
        • Hawk C
        • Phongphua C
        • Bleecker J
        • et al.
        Preliminary study of the reliability of assessment procedures for indications for chiropractic adjustments of the lumbar spine.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999; 22: 382-389
        • Potter L
        • McCarthy C
        • Oldham J
        Intraexaminer reliability of identifying a dysfunctional segment in the thoracic and lumbar spine.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006; 29: 203-207
        • Carmichael JP
        Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of palpation for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1987; 10: 164-171
        • Flynn T
        • Fritz J
        • Whitman J
        • et al.
        A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation.
        Spine. 2002; 27: 2835-2843
        • Herzog W
        • Read LJ
        • Conway PJ
        • et al.
        Reliability of motion palpation procedures to detect sacroiliac joint fixations.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989; 12: 86-92
        • Lundberg G
        • Gerdle B
        The relationships between spinal sagittal configuration, joint mobility, general low back mobility and segmental mobility in female homecare personnel.
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1999; 31: 197-206
        • Meijne W
        • van Neerbos K
        • Aufdemkampe G
        • et al.
        Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of the Gillet test.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999; 22: 4-9
        • Mior SA
        • McGregor M
        • Schut B
        The role of experience in clinical accuracy.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990; 13: 68-71
        • Paydar D
        • Thiel H
        • Gemmell H
        Intra- and interexaminer reliability of certain pelvic palpatory procedures and the sitting flexion test for sacroiliac joint mobility and dysfunction.
        J Neuromusculoskel Syst. 1994; 2: 65-69
        • Potter NA
        • Rothstein JM
        Intertester reliability for selected clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint.
        Phys Ther. 1985; 65: 1671-1675
        • Robinson HS
        • Brox JI
        • Robinson R
        • et al.
        The reliability of selected motion- and pain provocation tests for the sacroiliac joint.
        Man Ther. 2007; 12: 72-79
        • Strender LE
        • Lundin M
        • Nell K
        Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of the neck.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997; 20: 516-520
        • Strender LE
        • Sjoblom A
        • Sundell K
        • et al.
        Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of patients with low back pain.
        Spine. 1997; 22: 814-820
        • Tong HC
        • Heyman OG
        • Lado DA
        • et al.
        Interexaminer reliability of three methods of combining test results to determine side of sacral restriction, sacral base position, and innominate bone position.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006; 106: 464-468
        • Vincent-Smith B
        • Gibbons P
        Inter-examiner and intra-examiner reliability of the standing flexion test.
        Man Ther. 1999; 4: 87-93
        • Wiles M
        Reproducibility and interexaminer correlation of motion palpation findings of the sacroiliac joints.
        J Can Chiropr Assoc. 1980; 24: 56-69
        • Bergstrom E
        • Courtis G
        An inter- and intra-examiner reliability study of motion palpation of the lumbar spine in lateral flexion in the seated position.
        Eur J Chiropr. 1986; 34: 121-141
        • Binkley J
        • Stratford PW
        • Gill C
        Interrater reliability of lumbar accessory motion mobility testing.
        Phys Ther. 1995; 75: 786-792
        • Boline P
        • Keating J
        • Brist J
        • et al.
        Interexaminer reliability of palpatory evaluations of the lumbar spine.
        Am J Chiropr Med. 1988; 1: 5-11
        • Brismée JM
        • Gipson D
        • Ivie D
        • et al.
        Interrater reliability of a passive physiological intervertebral motion test in the mid-thoracic spine.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006; 29: 368-373
        • Christensen HW
        • Vach W
        • Vach K
        • et al.
        Palpation of the upper thoracic spine: an observer reliability study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002; 25: 285-292
        • Comeaux Z
        • Eland D
        • Chila A
        • et al.
        Measurement challenges in physical diagnosis: refining inter-rater palpation, perception and communication.
        J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2001; 5: 245-253
        • Degenhardt BF
        • Snider KT
        • Snider EJ
        • et al.
        Interobserver reliability of osteopathic palpatory diagnostic tests of the lumbar spine: improvements from consensus training.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005; 105: 465-473
        • Downey B
        • Taylor N
        • Niere K
        Can manipulative physiotherapists agree on which lumbar level to treat based on palpation?.
        Physiotherapy. 2003; 89: 74-81
        • Haas M
        • Panzer D
        • Raphael R
        Reliability of manual end-play palpation of the thoracic spine.
        Chiropr Tech. 1995; 7: 120-124
        • Hanten WP
        • Olson SL
        • Ludwig GM
        Reliability of manual mobility testing of the upper cervical spine in subjects with cervicogenic headache.
        J Man Manip Ther. 2002; 10: 76-82
        • Hicks GE
        • Fritz JM
        • Delitto A
        • et al.
        Interrater reliability of clinical examination measures for identification of lumbar segmental instability.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 1858-1864
        • Humphreys BK
        • Delahaye M
        • Peterson CK
        An investigation into the validity of cervical spine motion palpation using subjects with congenital block vertebrae as a ‘gold standard’.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004; 5: 19
        • Jull G
        • Bullock M
        A motion profile of the lumbar spine in an aging population assessed by manual examination.
        Physiother Pract. 1987; 3: 70-81
        • Love RM
        • Brodeur RR
        Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of motion palpation for the thoracolumbar spine.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1987; 10: 1-4
        • Maher C
        • Adams R
        Reliability of pain and stiffness assessments in clinical manual lumbar spine examination.
        Phys Ther. 1994; 74 (discussion 09-11): 801-809
        • Maher C
        • Latimer J
        • Adams R
        An investigation of the reliability and validity of posteroanterior spinal stiffness judgments made using a reference-based protocol.
        Phys Ther. 1998; 78: 829-837
        • Marcotte J
        • Normand MC
        • Black P
        The kinematics of motion palpation and its effect on the reliability for cervical spine rotation.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002; 25: E7
        • Marcotte J
        • Normand MC
        • Black P
        Measurement of the pressure applied during motion palpation and reliability for cervical spine rotation.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005; 28: 591-596
        • McPartland JM
        • Goodridge JP
        Counterstrain and traditional osteopathic examination of the cervical spine compared.
        J Body Mov Ther. 1997; 1: 173-178
        • Mior S
        • King R
        • McGregor M
        • et al.
        Intra and interexaminer reliability of motion palpation in the cervical spine.
        J Can Chiropr Assoc. 1985; 29: 195-199
        • Mootz RD
        • Keating JC
        • Kontz HP
        • et al.
        Intra- and interobserver reliability of passive motion palpation of the lumbar spine.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989; 12: 440-445
        • Nansel DD
        • Peneff AL
        • Jansen RD
        • et al.
        Interexaminer concordance in detecting joint-play asymmetries in the cervical spines of otherwise asymptomatic subjects.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989; 12: 428-433
        • Smedmark V
        • Wallin M
        • Arvidsson I
        Inter-examiner reliability in assessing passive intervertebral motion of the cervical spine.
        Man Ther. 2000; 5: 97-101
        • Zito G
        • Jull G
        • Story I
        Clinical tests of musculoskeletal dysfunction in the diagnosis of cervicogenic headache.
        Man Ther. 2006; 11: 118-129
        • Fjellner A
        • Bexander C
        • Faleij R
        • et al.
        Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of the cervical spine.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999; 22: 511-516
        • Keating JC
        • Bergmann TF
        • Jacobs GE
        • et al.
        Interexaminer reliability of eight evaluative dimensions of lumbar segmental abnormality.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990; 13: 463-470
        • Lindsay D
        • Meeuwisse W
        • Mooney M
        • et al.
        Interrater reliability of manual therapy assessment techniques.
        Phys Ther Can. 1995; 47: 173-180
        • Olson KA
        • Paris SV
        • Spohr C
        • et al.
        Radiographic assessment and reliability study of the craniovertebral sidebending.
        J Man Manip Ther. 1998; 6: 87-96
        • Phillips DR
        • Twomey LT
        A comparison of manual diagnosis with a diagnosis established by a uni-level lumbar spinal block procedure.
        Man Ther. 1996; 1: 82-87
        • Troyanovich SJ
        • Harrison DD
        • Harrison DE
        Motion palpation: it's time to accept the evidence.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998; 21: 568-571
        • Seffinger MA
        • Najm WI
        • Mishra SI
        • et al.
        Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: a systematic review of the literature.
        Spine. 2004; 29: E413-E425
        • Russell R
        Diagnostic palpation of the spine: a review of procedures and assessment of their reliability.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1983; 6: 181-183
        • Murphy LS
        • Reinsch S
        • Najm WI
        • et al.
        Spinal palpation: the challenges of information retrieval using available databases.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003; 26: 374-382
        • Billis EV
        • Foster NE
        • Wright CC
        Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in locating spinal levels by palpation.
        Man Ther. 2003; 8: 223-232