Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 32, ISSUE 9, P723-733, November 2009

Download started.

Ok

A Nonsurgical Approach to the Management of Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy Secondary to Herniated Disk: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study With Follow-Up

  • Donald R. Murphy
    Correspondence
    Submit requests for reprints to: Donald R. Murphy, DC, Rhode Island Spine Center, 600 Pawtucket Avenue, Pawtucket, RI 02860
    Affiliations
    Clinical Director, Rhode Island Spine Center, Pawtucket, RI

    Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Community Health, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI

    Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of Research, New York Chiropractic College, Seneca Falls, NY
    Search for articles by this author
  • Eric L. Hurwitz
    Affiliations
    Associate Professor of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences and Epidemiology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Mānoa, Hawaii
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ericka E. McGovern
    Affiliations
    Staff Chiropractic Physician, Rhode Island Spine Center, Pawtucket, RI
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Objective

      This study presents the outcomes of patients with lumbar radiculopathy secondary to disk herniation treated after a diagnosis-based clinical decision rule.

      Methods

      A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at a multidisciplinary, integrated clinic that includes chiropractic and physical therapy health care services. Data on 49 consecutive patients were collected at baseline, at the end of conservative, nonsurgical treatment and a mean of 14.5 months after cessation of treatment. Disability was measured using the Bournemouth Disability Questionnaire (BDQ) and pain using the Numerical Rating Scale for pain. Fear beliefs were measured with the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Patients also self-rated improvement.

      Results

      Mean duration of complaint was 60.5 weeks. Mean self-rated improvement at the end of treatment was 77.5%. Improvement was described as “good” or “excellent” in nearly 90% of patients. Mean percentage improvement on the BDQ was 60.4%. Numerical Rating Scale improved 4.1 points and FABQ improved 4.8 points. Clinically meaningful improvements in pain and disability were seen in 79% and 70% of patients, respectively. Mean number of visits was 13.2. After an average long-term follow-up of 14.5 months, mean self-rated improvement was 81.1%. “Good” or “excellent” improvement was reported by 80% of patients. Mean percentage improvement in BDQ was 67.4%. Numerical Rating Scale improved 4.2 points and FABQ 4.5 points. Clinically meaningful improvements in pain and disability were seen in 79% and 73% of patients, respectively.

      Conclusions

      Management based on the decision rule yielded favorable outcomes in this cohort study. Improvement appeared to be maintained over the long term.

      Key Indexing Terms

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hurwitz EL
        • Shekelle P
        Epidemiology of low back syndromes.
        in: Morris CE Low back syndromes: integrated clinical management. McGraw-Hill, New York2006: 83-118
        • Frymoyer JW
        Back pain and sciatica.
        N Engl J Med. 1988; 318: 291-300
        • Memmo PA
        • Nadler S
        • Malanga G
        Lumbar disc herniations: a review of surgical and non-surgical indications and outcomes.
        J Back Musculoskel Rehabil. 2000; 14: 79-88
        • Skogsbergh DR
        • Kowalski MH
        The intervertebral disc and its syndromes.
        in: Morris CE Low back syndromes: integrated clinical management. McGraw-Hill, New York2006: 149-184
        • Murphy DR
        • Hurwitz EL
        A theoretical model for the development of a diagnosis-based clinical decision rule for the management of patients with spinal pain.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007; 8: 75
        • Murphy DR
        • Hurwitz EL
        • Nelson CF
        A diagnosis-based clinical decision rule for patients with spinal pain. Part 2: Review of the literature.
        Chiropr Osteopath. 2008; 16: 8
        • Murphy DR
        • Hurwitz EL
        • Gregory AA
        • Clary R
        A nonsurgical approach to the management of patients with cervical radiculopathy: a prospective observational cohort study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006; 29: 279-287
        • Murphy DR
        • Hurwitz EL
        • Gregory AA
        • Clary R
        A non-surgical approach to the management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational cohort study.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006; 7: 16
        • Murphy DR
        • Hurwitz EL
        • McGovern EE
        Outcome of pregnancy related lumbopelvic pain treated according to a diagnosis-based clinical decision rule: a prospective observational cohort study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009; ([in press]): 32
        • Murphy DR
        • Rosenblum A
        Return to work after two years of total disability: a case report.
        J Occup Rehab. 2006; 16: 253-260
        • Shacklock M.
        Clinical neurodynamics. A new system of musculoskeletal treatment.
        Elsevier, Edinburgh2005
        • Swensen RS
        Neurologic examination.
        in: Haldeman S 3rd ed. Principles and practice of chiropractic. McGraw-Hill, New York2005: 537-560
        • Lawrence DJ
        • Meeker W
        • Branson R
        • Bronfort G
        • Cates JR
        • Haas M
        • Haneline M
        • Micozzi M
        • Updyke W
        • Mootz R
        • Triano JJ
        • Hawk C
        Chiropractic management of low back pain and low back–related leg complaints: a literature synthesis.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008; 31: 659-674
        • Gudavalli MR
        • Cox JM
        • Cramer GD
        • Baker JA
        • Patwardhan AG
        Intervertebral disc pressure changes during low back treatment procedures.
        in: BED—Advances in Bioengineering. 1998: 39
        • Gudavalli MR
        • Cox JM
        • Cramer GD
        • Baker JA
        • Patwardhan AG
        Intervertebral disc pressure changes during a chiropractic procedure.
        in: BED—Advances in Bioengineering. 36. 1997: 215-216
        • Gudavalli M
        • Cambron J
        • McGregor M
        • Jedlicka J
        • Keenum M
        • Ghanayem A
        • Patwardhan A
        A randomized clinical trail and subgroup analysis to compare flexion-distraction with active exercise for chronic low back pain.
        Eur Spine. 2005; 15: 1070-1082
        • Butler DS.
        The sensitive nervous system.
        Noigroup Publications, Adelaide, Australia2000
        • McKenzie RA
        • May S.
        The lumbar spine: mechanical diagnosis and therapy.
        2nd ed. Spinal Publications, Waikenae, NZ2003
        • Laslett M
        • Aprill CN
        • McDonald B
        • Young SB
        Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests.
        Man Ther. 2005; 10: 207-218
        • Laslett M
        • McDonald B
        • Aprill CN
        • Tropp H
        • Oberg B
        Clinical predictors of screening lumbar zygapophyseal joint blocks: development of clinical prediction rules.
        Spine J. 2006; 6: 370-379
        • Stern PJ
        • Cote P
        • Cassidy JD
        A series of consecutive cases of low back pain with radiating leg pain treated by chiropractors.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 335-342
        • Chaitow L
        • Liebenson C
        Muscle energy techniques.
        2nd ed. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone2001
        • Simons DG
        • Travell JG
        • Simons LS.
        Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual. Volume 1.
        Williams and Wilkens, Baltimore1999
        • Murphy DR
        • Morris CE
        Lumbopelvic sensorimotor training and functional stabilization.
        in: Morris CE Low back syndromes: integrated clinical management. McGraw-Hill, New York2006: 741-780
        • Staal JB
        • Hlobil H
        • Twisk JWR
        • Smid T
        • Koke AJA
        • van Mechelen W
        Graded activity for low back pain in occupational health care.
        Ann Int Med. 2004; 140: 77-84
        • Klaber Moffett JA
        • Carr J
        • Howarth E
        High fear-avoiders of physical activity benefit from an exercise program for patients with back pain.
        Spine. 2004; 29: 1167-1172
        • Bolton JE
        • Breen AC.
        The Bournemouth Questionnaire. A short-form comprehensive outcome measure. I. Psychometric properties in back pain patients.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999; 22: 503-510
        • Farrar JT
        • Young JP
        • LaMoreaux L
        • Werth JL
        • Poole RM
        Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale.
        Pain. 2001; 94: 149-158
        • Hurst H
        • Bolton J
        Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004; 27: 26-35
        • Waddell G
        • Newton M
        • Henderson I
        • Somerville D
        • Main C.J
        A fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability.
        Pain. 1993; 52: 157-168
        • Vroomen PCAJ
        • de Krom CTFM
        • Knottnerus JA
        Consistency of history taking and physical examination in patients with suspected lumbar nerve root involvement.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 91-97
        • Hunt DG
        • Zuberbier OA
        • Kozlowski AJ
        • et al.
        Reliability of the lumbar flexion, lumbar extension, and passive straight leg raise test in normal populations embedded within a complete physical examination.
        Spine. 2001; 26: 2714-2718
        • McCombe PF
        • Fairbank JCT
        • Cockersole BC
        • Pynsent PB
        Reproducibility of physical signs in low-back pain.
        Spine. 1989; 14: 908-918
        • Lurie J
        What diagnostic tests are useful for low back pain?.
        Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005; 19: 557-575
        • Rebain R
        • Baxter GD
        • McDonough S
        A systematic review of the passive straight leg raising test as a diagnostic aid for low back pain (1989 to 2000).
        Spine. 2002; 27: E388-E395
        • Perle SM
        • Kawchuk GN
        • Perrault T
        • Adams W
        Radiographically determined anatomical location of point of peak pressure during pisiform and hypothenar contact manipulation procedures.
        in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spinal Manipulation Oct 5-6. Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research, Toronto2002: 20
        • Young S
        • Aprill C
        • Laslett M
        Correlation of clinical examination characteristics with three sources of chronic low back pain.
        Spine J. 2003; 3: 460-465
        • Laslett M
        • Young SB
        • Aprill CN
        • McDonald B.
        Diagnosing painful sacroiliac joints: a validity study of a McKenzie evaluation and sacroiliac provocation tests.
        Aus J Physiother. 2003; 49: 89-97
        • Richardson C
        • Jull G
        • Hodges P
        • Hides J
        Therapeutic exercise for spinal segmental stabilization in low back pain. Scientific basis and clinical approach.
        Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1999
        • Weinstein JN
        • Tosteson TD
        • Lurie JD
        • et al.
        Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial.
        JAMA. 2006; 296: 2441-2450
        • Wilson-MacDonald J
        • Burt G
        • Griffin D
        • Glynn C
        Epidural steroid injection for nerve root compression has short term but no long term effect: a randomised controlled trial.
        Spine J. 2004; 4: 20S
        • Kopp JR
        • Alexander AH
        • Turocy RH
        • Levrini MG
        • Lichtman DM
        The use of lumbar extension in the evaluation and treatment of patients with acute herniated nucleus pulposus. A preliminary report.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; : 211-218
        • Alexander AH
        • Jones AM
        • Rosenbaum DH
        Nonoperative management of herniated nucleus pulposus patient selection by the extension sign.
        Orthop Rev. 1992; 21: 181-188
        • Werneke M
        • Hart DL
        Centralization phenomenon as a prognostic factor for chronic low back pain and disability.
        Spine. 2001; 26: 758-764
        • Werneke MW
        • Hart DL
        Centralization: association between repeated end-range pain responses and behavioral signs in patients with acute non-specific low back pain.
        J Rehabil Med. 2005; 37: 286-290
        • Werneke M
        • Hart DL
        • Cook D
        A descriptive study of the centralization phenomenon a prospective analysis.
        Spine. 1999; 24: 676-683
        • Burton AK
        • Tillotson KM
        • Cleary J
        Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.
        Eur Spine J. 2000; 9: 202-207
        • Santilli V
        • Beghi E
        • Finucci S
        Chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of acute back pain and sciatica with disc protrusion: a randomized double-blind clinical trial of active and simulated spinal manipulations.
        Spine J. 2006; 6: 131-137
        • Murphy D
        • Byfield D
        • McCarthy P
        • Humphreys K.
        • Gregory A
        • Rochon R
        Interexaminer reliability of the hip extension test for suspected impaired motor control of the lumbar spine.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006; 29: 374-377
        • Hicks GE
        • Fritz JM
        • Delitto A
        • Mishock J
        Interrater reliability of clinical examination measures for identification of lumbar segmental instability.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 1858-1864
        • Mens JMA
        • Vleeming A
        • Snijders CJ
        • Koes BJ
        • Stam HJ
        Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy.
        Spine. 2001; 26: 1167-1171
        • McGill S.
        Low back disorders. Evidence-based prevention and rehabilitation.
        Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL2002
        • Rackwitz B
        • de Bie R
        • Limm H
        • von Garnier K
        • Ewert T
        • Stucki G.
        Segmental stabilizing exercises and low back pain. What is the evidence? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
        Clin Rehab. 2006; 20: 553-567
        • Bakhtiary AH
        • Safavi-Farokhi Z
        • Rezasoltani A
        Lumbar stabilizing exercises improve activities of daily living in patients with lumbar disc herniation.
        J Back Musculoskel Rehab. 2005; 18: 55-60
        • Hlobil H
        • Staal JB
        • Twisk J
        • Koke A
        • Ariens G
        • Smid T
        • van Mechelen W
        The effects of a graded activity intervention for low back pain in occupational health on sick leave, functional status and pain: 12-month results of a randomized controlled trial.
        J Occup Rehabil. 2005; 15: 569-580
        • Lindstrom I
        • Ohlund C
        • Eek C
        • et al.
        The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach.
        Phys Ther. 1992; 72 ([discussion 91-3]): 279-290
        • DeLeo JA
        • Winkelstein BA
        Physiology of chronic spinal pain syndromes from animal models to biomechanics.
        Spine. 2002; 27: 2526-2537
        • Smeets R
        • Vlaeyen J
        • Kester A
        • Knottnerus J
        Reduction of pain catastrophizing mediates the outcome of both physical and cognitive-behavioral treatment in chronic low back pain.
        J Pain. 2006; 7: 261-271
        • Schonstein E
        • Kenny D
        • Keating J
        • Koes B
        • Herbert RD
        Physical conditioning programs for workers with back and neck pain a Cochrane systematic review.
        Spine. 2003; 28: E391-E395
        • Kaapa EH
        • Frantsi K
        • Sarna S
        • Malmivaara A
        Multidisciplinary group rehabilitation versus individual physiotherapy for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized trial.
        Spine. 2006; 31: 371-376
        • Asenlof P
        • Denison E
        • Lindberg P
        Individually tailored treatment targeting activity, motor behavior, and cognition reduces pain-related disability: a randomized controlled trial in patients with musculoskeletal pain.
        J Pain. 2005; 6: 588-603
        • Senstad O
        • Leboeuf-Yde C
        • Borchgrevink C
        Frequency and characteristics of side effects of spinal manipulative therapy.
        Spine. 1997; 22: 435-441
        • Hurwitz EL
        • Morgenstern H
        • Vassilaki M
        • Chiang LM
        Adverse reactions to chiropractic treatment and their effects on satisfaction and clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in the UCLA neck pain study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004; 27: 16-25
        • Hurwitz EL
        • Morgenstern H
        • Vassilaki M
        • Chiang LM
        Frequency and clinical predictors of adverse reactions to chiropractic care in the UCLA neck pain study.
        Spine. 2005; 30: 1477-1484
        • Carey TS
        • Boden SD
        A critical guide to case series reports.
        Spine. 2003; 28: 1631-1634