Advertisement
Original Research| Volume 40, ISSUE 8, P580-586, October 2017

Download started.

Ok

A Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution and Disk Displacement in Response to Lumbar Rotation Manipulation in the Sitting and Side-Lying Positions

  • Li Li
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Yi-Kai Li, PhD, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, No. 1838, North of Guangzhou Great Road, Bai Yun District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510515, China. Tel.: +86 13728025284.
    Affiliations
    School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Tong Shen
    Affiliations
    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yi-Kai Li
    Affiliations
    School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Objective

      This study aimed to investigate stress distribution and disk displacement in healthy and degenerated intervertebral disks during simulated lumbar rotation manipulation (LRM) in the sitting and side-lying positions.

      Methods

      Three-dimensional (3D) finite element models of healthy, mildly degenerated and moderately degenerated L4/5 spinal units were reconstructed. Lumbar rotation manipulation in the sitting and side-lying positions were simulated, and alterations in stress distribution and disk displacement in the lumbar disks were observed.

      Results

      The application of LRM in the sitting or side-lying position resulted in a similar stress distribution in healthy, mildly degenerated, and moderately degenerated disks. Stress was concentrated at the anterior right side of the annulus. In all disks, intradiskal pressure (IDP) and maximum von Mises stress were higher during LRM in the sitting position than during LRM in the side-lying position. During these manipulations, Intradiskal pressure and stress in the annulus of moderately degenerated disks were higher than in mildly degenerated disks. Displacement was most obvious in healthy disks.

      Conclusions

      Mildly and moderately degenerated lumbar disks were subject to higher stress during LRM in the sitting position than during LRM in the side-lying position. Intradiskal pressure and the maximum von Mises stress in the annulus of moderately degenerated disks increased, suggesting the need for caution when treating patients with moderately compromised disks. Although our results are in accordance with previously published data, they are simulated and preliminary and do not necessarily replicate the clinical condition.

      Key Indexing Terms

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Andersson GB
        Epidemiological features of chronic low back pain.
        Lancet. 1999; 354: 581-585
        • Balague F
        • Mannion AF
        • Pellise F
        • Cedraschi C
        Non-specific low back pain.
        Lancet. 2012; 379: 482-491
        • Colloca CJ
        • Gunzburg R
        • Freeman BJ
        • Szpalski M
        • Afifi M
        • Moore RJ
        Biomechancial quantification of pathologic manipulable spinal lesions: an in vivo ovine model of spondylolysis and intervertebral disc degeneration.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012; 35: 354-366
        • Kohlmann T
        Musculoskeletal pain in the population.
        Schmerz. 2003; 17: 405-411
        • Globe G
        • Farabaugh RJ
        • Hawk C
        • et al.
        Clinical practice guideline: chiropractic care for low back pain.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016; 39: 1-22
        • Moradi B
        • Hagmann S
        • Zahlten-Hinguranage A
        • et al.
        Efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective clinical study in 395 patients.
        J Clin Rheumatol. 2012; 18: 76-82
        • Weeks WB
        • Leininger B
        • Whedon JM
        • et al.
        The association between use of chiropractic care and costs of care among older Medicare patients with chronic low back pain and multiple comorbidities.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016; 39: 63-75
        • Vavrek DA
        • Sharma R
        • Haas M
        Cost analysis related to dose-response of spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014; 37: 300-311
        • Wang B
        The effect of manipulation on the treating lumbar disc herniation.
        Chin Manipul Qigong Ther. 2007; 23: 22-24
        • Li JB
        • Xiong QL
        • Qu SK
        • Yi HC
        Application of manipulation for lumbar disc herniation: literature analysis in recent 10 years.
        Chin J Tissue Eng Res. 2014; 18: 7211-7216
        • Zhang Y
        • Bi S
        • Zhao WD
        • Li YK
        Effects of lumbar rotatory manipulation on changes of intrapressure of the lumbar disc and transposition of nerve roots.
        J Cervicodynia Lumbodynia. 2001; 22: 184-186
        • Liu Q
        • Zhang J
        • Zhang H
        • Qiang J
        Effect of different lumbar vertebrae pulling method on intradiscal pressure.
        J Trad Chin Orthop Traumatol. 2014; 26: 11-16
        • Bi S
        • Li YK
        • Zhao WD
        • Zhang Y
        • Hou JS
        • Wang FG
        A study on mechanism of manipulation used in lumbar disc herniation.
        Chin J Rehabil Med. 2001; 16: 8-10
        • Bi S
        • Li YK
        • Wang AY
        • Zhao WD
        • Zhang Y
        • Wang FG
        An observation on stress for lumbar manipulations.
        Chin J Rehabil Med. 2001; 16: 144-145
        • Bi S
        • Li YK
        • Zhao WD
        • et al.
        Comparative study of simulated lumbar manipulation techniques using biomechanical and three-dimensional finite element models.
        Chin J Phys Rehabil Med. 2002; 24: 525-528
        • Xu HT
        • Xu CD
        • Zhang MC
        • Li YK
        • Li YG
        • Wang GL
        The study on deformation and displacement of the lumbar during rotatory manipulation.
        Chin J Clin Anat. 2008; 26: 321-324
        • Wang GL
        • Zhang MC
        • Li YK
        • Xu HT
        • Qiu GC
        Comparison of lumbar rotation manipulation in three lumbar flexion levels.
        J Cervicodynia Lumbodynia. 2008; 29: 24-26
        • Xu HT
        Li Song, Liu L, et al. Finite element analysis of the intervertebral disc during lumbar oblique-pulling manipulation.
        Chin J Clin Rehabil Tissue Eng Res. 2011; 15: 2335-2338
        • Wu S
        • Zhang MC
        • Li YK
        • Tian Q
        • Guo RS
        • Zhong QL
        The finite element analysis of stresses and displacements in discs undergoing two rotator manipulations.
        Guangdong Med J. 2010; 31: 992-994
        • Hu H
        • Xiong CY
        • Han GW
        Finite element analysis of lumbar pelvic and proximal femur model with simulated lumbar rotatory manipulation.
        Chin J Orthop Trauma. 2012; 25: 582-586
        • Yang XW
        • Chen ZJ
        • Zhang SQ
        • Zhang MC
        • Li YK
        A three-dimensional finite element analysis of sacroiliac joint exerted simulating oblique-pulling manipulation.
        J Pract Med. 2014; 30: 2228-2230
        • Polikeit A
        • Ferguson SJ
        • Nolte LP
        • Orr TE
        Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.
        Eur Spine J. 2003; 12: 413-420
        • Goel VK
        • Monroe BT
        • Gilbertson LG
        • Brinckmann P
        Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc. Finite element analysis of the L3-L4 motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 689-698
        • Schmidt H
        • Kettler A
        • Rohlmann A
        • Claes L
        • Wilke HJ
        The risk of disc prolapses with complex loading in different degrees of disc degeneration—a finite element analysis.
        Clin Biomech. 2007; 22: 988-998
        • Galbusera F
        • Schmidt H
        • Neidlinger-Wilke C
        • Wilke HJ
        The mechanical response of the lumbar spine to different combinations of disc degenerative changes investigated using randomized poroelastic finite element models.
        Eur Spine J. 2011; 20: 563-571
        • Chen JW
        The effect of spinal rotator manipulation on lumbar disc herniation.
        Guid China Med. 2010; 8: 139-140
        • Chen F
        • Zeng WQ
        • Mo DZ
        • Wei H
        • Ge C
        • Yuan ZC
        Supine oblige pull method treatment of lumbar disc herniation standardized.
        Guid J Tradit Chin Med Pharm. 2012; 18: 1-3
        • Li YK
        • Wang GL
        • Xu HT
        • Qiu GC
        Study on dose-effect relationship of cracking sounds and largest manipulative force by lumbar rotated and localized manipulation.
        Chin J Clin Anat. 2004; 22: 658-660
        • Xu HT
        • Xu DC
        • Li YK
        • et al.
        A study on manipulative forces during cracking sounds arising from lumbar oblique-pulling manipulation.
        Chin J Rehabil Med. 2008; 23: 202-204
        • Heuer F
        • Schmidt H
        • Klezl Z
        • Claes L
        • Wilke HJ
        Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase range of motion and change lordosis angle.
        J Biomech. 2007; 40: 271-280
        • Panjabi MM
        • Oxland TR
        • Yamamoto I
        • Crisco JJ
        Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1994; 76: 413-424
        • Schultz AB
        • Warwich DN
        • Berkson MH
        • Nachemson AL
        Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments. Part 1: Responses in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and torsion.
        J Biomech Eng. 1979; 101: 46-52
        • Markolf KL
        • Morris JM
        The structural components of the intervertebral disc: a study of their contributions to the ability of the disc to withstand compressive forces.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974; 56: 675-687
        • Natarajan RN
        • Williams JR
        • Andersson GB
        Modeling changes in intervertebral disc mechanics with degeneration.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 36-40
        • Ruberte LM
        • Natarajan RN
        • Andersson GB
        Influence of single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease on the behavior of the adjacent segments—a finite element model study.
        J Biomech. 2009; 42: 341-348
        • Galbusera F
        • Schmidt H
        • Neidlinger-Wilke C
        • Wilke HJ
        The effect of degenerative morphological changes of the intervertebral disc on the lumbar spine biomechanics: a poroelastic finite element investigation.
        Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2011; 14: 729-739
        • Rohlmann A
        • Zander T
        • Schmidt H
        • Wilke HJ
        • Bergmann G
        Analysis of the influence of disc degeneration on the mechanical behaviour of a lumbar motion segment using the finite element method.
        J Biomech. 2006; 39: 2484-2490
        • Wilke HJ
        • Rohlmann F
        • Neidlinger-Wilke C
        • Werner K
        • Claes L
        • Kettler A
        Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part I. Lumbar spine.
        Eur Spine J. 2006; 15: 720-730
        • Fan RX
        • Gong H
        • Qiu S
        • Zhang XB
        • Fang J
        • Zhu D
        Effects of resting modes on human lumbar spines with different levels of degenerated intervertebral discs: a finite element investigation.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16: 221
        • Zhang S
        The effect of lumbar rotatory manipulation combined with acupuncture for lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion.
        Clin Med. 2010; 3: 100-101
        • Adams M
        • McNally D
        • Dolan P
        Stress distributions inside intervertebral discs the effect of age and degeneration.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996; 78: 965-972
        • Nachemson AL
        • Schultz AB
        • Berkson MH
        Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments: influences of age, sex, disc level, and degeneration.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1979; 4: 1-8
        • Hussain M
        • Gay RE
        • An KN
        Reduction in disk and fiber stresses by axial distraction is higher in cervical disk with fibers oriented toward the vertical rather than horizontal plane: a finite element model analysis.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010; 33: 252-260
        • Goel VK
        • Kong W
        • Han JS
        • Weinstein JN
        • Gilbertson LG
        A combined finite element and optimization investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993; 18: 1531-1541
        • Elfering A
        • Semmer N
        • Birkhofer D
        • Zanetti M
        • Hodler J
        • Boos N
        Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration. A 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 27: 125-134