Advertisement

Patient Concerns and Beliefs Related to Audible Popping Sound and the Effectiveness of Manipulation: Findings From an Online Survey

      Abstract

      Objective

      The purpose of this study was to assess whether beliefs about the origin of the popping sound and the effects of thrust manipulation (TM) were in agreement with current scientific evidence and whether a practitioner's explanation could influence patient beliefs of theoretical mechanisms.

      Methods

      A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in Italy from January 7, 2019 to April 20, 2019. The questionnaire was sent to 900 Italian adults through online recruitment, including people with and without a history of manipulation, such as given by physiotherapists, chiropractors, osteopaths, and manual medicine physicians to manage musculoskeletal disorders. The questionnaire consisted of 11 multiple-choice questions and could be completed within 15 weeks. The Likert scale was used to investigate participants' attitudes. Sex and previous experience of TM variables were evaluated using a Student's t-test; a 1-way F analysis of variance test was performed to evaluate age, educational qualification, and the professional who performed the TM.

      Results

      We retrieved 478 questionnaires, including 175 participants with no TM history and 303 with TM history. There were 31% of participants (n = 94) with a history of TM who reported they did not receive explanations regarding manipulation. The participants' beliefs mostly disagreed with the current hypotheses provided by the scientific literature on the theoretical mechanisms of popping sound (tribonucleation and cavitation). There were 9.9% (n = 30) of participants who answered “realignment of bone positional fault” to explain the mechanism behind TM. There was a high degree of agreement with the belief that the popping sound should be present for a successful TM (respectively, 2.8 standard deviation [SD; 1.2] and 2.6 SD [1.2] for TM+ and TM− participants). No statistically significant differences were found between participants with and without a history of TM.

      Conclusion

      The participants in this study reported a belief that popping was related to effectiveness of TM. A high percentage of this sample had beliefs about TM mechanisms for the audible popping sound that were inconsistent with current literature. Beliefs were similar between groups, suggesting that instructions given by TM practitioners did not seem to be an influence on these patients’ beliefs.

      Key Indexing Terms

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gwendolen J
        • Moore A
        • Falla D
        • Lewis J
        • McCarthy C
        • Sterling M.
        Grieve's Modern Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy.
        Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA2015
        • Evans D
        • Lucas N.
        What is “manipulation”? A reappraisal.
        Man Ther. 2010; 3: 286-291
        • Dunning J.
        • Mourad F
        • Zingoni A
        • et al.
        Cavitation sounds during cervicothoracic spinal manipulation.
        Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017; 4: 642-654
        • Rubinstein S
        • De Zoete A
        • Van Middelkoop M
        • Assendelft W
        • De Boer M
        • Van Tulder M.
        Benefits and harms of spinal manipulative therapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
        BMJ. 2019; 1689: 1-15
        • Paige N
        • Miake-Lye I
        • Booth M
        • et al.
        Association of spinal manipulative therapy with clinical benefit and harm for acute low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        JAMA. 2017; 317: 1451-1460
        • Wong J
        • Coté P
        • Sutton D
        • et al.
        Clinical practice guidelines for the noninvasive management of low back pain: A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration.
        Eur J Pain. 2016; 2: 201-216
        • Blanpied P
        • Gross A
        • Elliott J
        • et al.
        Neck pain: revision 2017.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017; 7: A1-A83
        • O'Sullivan K
        • O'Keeffe M
        • O'Sullivan P
        NICE low back pain guidelines: opportunities and obstacles to change practice.
        Br J Sports Med. 2017; 22: 1632-1633
        • Rozmovits L
        • Mior S
        • Boon H.
        Exploring approaches to patient safety: the case of spinal manipulation therapy.
        BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016; 164: 1-9
        • MacDonald C
        • Osmotherly P
        • Parkes R
        • Rivett D.
        The current manipulation debate: historical context to address a broken narrative.
        J Man Manip Ther. 2019; 1: 1-4
        • Roston A
        • Haines W.
        Cracking in the metacarpo-phalangeal joint.
        J Anat. 1947; 2: 165-173
        • Unsworth A
        • Dowson D
        • Wright V.
        A bioengineering study of cavitation in the metacarpophalangeal joint.
        Ann Rheum. 1971; 30: 348-358
        • Rubinstein S
        • Terwee C
        • Assendelft W
        • de Boer M
        • van Tulder M.
        Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low-back pain.
        Cochrane Database Systemat Rev. 2012; 9: 1-74
        • Kawchuk G
        • Fryer J
        • Jaremko J
        • Zeng H
        • Rowe L
        • Thompson R.
        Real-time visualization of joint cavitation.
        PLos One. 2015; 4: 1-11
        • Chandran Suja V
        • Barakat A
        A mathematical model for the sounds produced by knuckle cracking.
        Sci Rep. 2018; 1: 1-9
        • Mourad F
        • Dunning J
        • Zingoni A
        • et al.
        Unilateral and multiple cavitation sounds during lumbosacral spinal manipulation.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019; 1: 12-22
        • Dunning J
        • Mourad F
        • Barbero M
        • Leoni D
        • Cescon C
        • Butts R.
        Bilateral and multiple cavitation sounds during upper cervical thrust manipulation.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013; 24: 1-12
        • Cramer G
        • Ross J
        • Raju P
        • et al.
        Distribution of cavitations as identified with accelerometry during lumbar spinal manipulation.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011; 9: 572-583
        • Herzog W
        • Zhang Y
        • Conway P
        • Kawchuk G.
        Cavitation sounds during spinal manipulative treatments.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993; 8: 523-526
        • Ross J
        • Bereznick D
        • McGill S.
        Determining cavitation location during lumbar and thoracic spinal manipulation: is spinal manipulation accurate and specific?.
        Spine. 2004; 13: 1452-1457
        • Triano J.
        Studies on the biomechanical effect of a spinal adjustment.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 1: 71-75
        • González-Iglesias J
        • Fernández-de-las-Peñas C
        • Cleland J
        • Alburquerque-Sendín F
        • Palomeque-del-Cerro L
        • Méndez-Sánchez R
        Inclusion of thoracic spine thrust manipulation into an electro-therapy/thermal program for the management of patients with acute mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.
        Man Ther. 2009; 3: 306-313
        • González-Iglesias J
        • Fernández-de-las-Peñas C
        • Cleland J
        • Gutiérrez-Vega M
        Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 1: 20-27
        • Dunning J
        • Cleland J
        • Waldrop M
        • et al.
        Upper cervical and upper thoracic thrust manipulation versus nonthrust mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 1: 5-18
        • Leysen M
        • Nijs J
        • Van Wilgen CP
        • et al.
        Illness perceptions explain the variance in functional disability, but not habitual physical activity, in patients with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study.
        Pain Pract. 2018; 4: 523-531
        • Foster N
        • Bishop A
        • Thomas E
        • et al.
        Illness perceptions of low back pain patients in primary care: what are they, do they change and are they associated with outcome?.
        Pain. 2008; 1-2: 177-187
        • Foster N
        • Thomas E
        • Bishop A
        • Dunn K
        • Main C.
        Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care.
        Pain. 2010; 3: 398-406
        • Scholten-Peeters G
        • Thoomes E
        • Konings S
        • et al.
        Is manipulative therapy more effective than sham manipulation in adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Chiropr Man Therap. 2013; 34: 1-19
        • Flynn T
        • Fritz J
        • Wainner R
        • Whitman J.
        The audible pop is not necessary for successful spinal high-velocity thrust manipulation in individuals with low back pain.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 7: 1057-1060
        • Flynn T
        • Childs J
        • Fritz J.
        The audible pop from high-velocity thrust manipulation and outcome in individuals with low back pain.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006; 1: 40-45
        • Bakker M
        • Miller J.
        Does an audible release improve the outcome of a chiropractic adjustment?.
        J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2004; 3: 237-239
        • Cleland J
        • Flynn T
        • Childs J
        • Eberhart S.
        The audible pop from thoracic spine thrust manipulation and its relation to short-term outcomes in patients with neck pain.
        J Man Manip Ther. 2007; 3: 143-154
        • Sillevis R
        • Cleland J
        Immediate effects of the audible pop from a thoracic spine thrust manipulation on the autonomic nervous system and pain: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011; 1: 37-45
        • Funabashi M
        • Pohlman K
        • Goldsworthy R
        • et al.
        Beliefs, perceptions and practices of chiropractors and patients about mitigation strategies for benign adverse events after spinal manipulation therapy.
        Chiropr Man Therap. 2020; 1: 1-9
        • Demoulin C
        • Baeri D
        • Toussaint G
        • et al.
        Beliefs in the population about cracking sounds produced during spinal manipulation.
        Joint Bone Spine. 2018; 2: 239-242
        • Miller P
        • Poggetti A.
        Qualitative study on chiropractic patients’ personal perception of the audible release and cavitation.
        Clin Chiropract. 2011; 1: 8-16
        • Eysenbach G.
        Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES).
        J Med Internet Res. 2004; 3: e34
        • Von Elm E
        • Altman D
        • Pocock S
        • Gøtzsche P
        • Vandenbroucke J.
        Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (StroBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
        Lancet. 2007; 9596: 1453-1457
        • Fan W
        • Yan Z.
        Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: a systematic review.
        Comput Human Behav. 2010; 2: 132-139
        • Rossettini G
        • Palese A
        • Geri T
        • Fiorio M
        • Colloca L
        • Testa M.
        Physical therapists’ perspectives on using contextual factors in clinical practice: findings from an Italian national survey.
        PLos One. 2018; 11: 1-28
        • Viceconti A
        • Geri T
        • De Luca S
        • et al.
        Neuropathic pain and symptoms of potential small-fiber neuropathy in fibromyalgic patients: a national on-line survey.
        Joint Bone Spine. 2021; 4
        • Maselli F
        • Esculier J
        • Storari L
        • et al.
        Low back pain among Italian runners: a cross-sectional survey.
        Phys Ther Sport. 2021; : 136-145
        • Association W.M.
        World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.
        JAMA. 2014; 3: 14-18
        • Bialosky J
        • George S
        • Bishop M.
        How spinal manipulative therapy works: why ask why?.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008; 6: 293-295
        • Coulter I
        • Crawford C
        • Hurwitz E
        • et al.
        Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Spine. 2018; 5: 866-879
        • Vlaeyen J
        • Linton S.
        Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art.
        Pain. 2000; 3: 317-332
        • Darlow B
        • Dowell A
        • Baxter G
        • Mathieson F
        • Perry M
        • Dean S.
        The enduring impact of what clinicians say to people with low back pain.
        Ann Fam Med. 2013; 6: 527-534
        • Demoulin C
        • Roussel N
        • Marty M
        • et al.
        The maladaptive beliefs of patients with low back pain. A narrative review.
        Rev Med Liege. 2016; 1: 40-46
        • Reggars J.
        The therapeutic benefit of the audible release associated with spinal manipulative therapy.
        Australas Chiropr Osteopathy. 1998; 2: 80-85
        • Evans D.
        Why do spinal manipulation techniques take the form they do? Towards a general model of spinal manipulation.
        Man Ther. 2010; 3: 212-219
        • Curotti M
        • Vongher A
        • Maselli F
        • Testa M.
        Pop sound ed efficacia delle High Velocity Low Amplitude Thrust: realtà clinica o mito?.
        Sci Riabilitat. 2017; 1: 20-34
        • Darlaw B
        • Fullen B
        • Dean S
        • Hurley D
        • Baxter G
        • Dowell A.
        The association between health care professional attitudes and beliefs and the attitudes and beliefs, clinical management, and outcomes of patients with low back pain: a systematic review.
        Eur J Pain. 2012; 1: 3-17
        • Geri T
        • Viceconti A
        • Minacci M
        • Testa M
        • Rossettini G.
        Manual therapy: exploiting the role of human touch.
        Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019; 44102044
        • Bialosky J
        • Bishop M
        • Robinson M
        • Barabas J
        • George S.
        The influence of expectation on spinal manipulation induced hypoalgesia: an experimental study in normal subjects.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 19: 1-9
        • Bialosky J
        • Bishop M
        • Penza C.
        Placebo mechanisms of manual therapy: a sheep in wolf's clothing?.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017; 5: 301-304
        • Rossettini G
        • Testa M.
        Manual therapy RCTs: should we control placebo in placebo control?.
        Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018; 3: 500-501
        • Rossettini G
        • Colombi A
        • Carlino E
        • et al.
        Unraveling negative expectations and nocebo-related effects in musculoskeletal pain.
        Front Psychol. 2022; 13789377
        • Colloca L
        • Benedetti F.
        Nocebo hyperalgesia: how anxiety is turned into pain.
        Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007; 5: 435-439
        • Darlow B.
        Beliefs about back pain: the confluence of client, clinician and community.
        Int J Osteopath Med. 2016; : 53-61